<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from Panic HQ in Portland, Oregon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:13:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-9574</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-9574</guid>
		<description>I like the one used in NewsLeecher the best .. its an old-style eraser (two-tone) and says &quot;CleanUp&quot; next to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the one used in NewsLeecher the best .. its an old-style eraser (two-tone) and says &#8220;CleanUp&#8221; next to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-9233</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-9233</guid>
		<description>So whats the deal? Where is the great reveal? Is this part of Transmit 4/Unison, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So whats the deal? Where is the great reveal? Is this part of Transmit 4/Unison, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Carlsson</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-8965</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Carlsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-8965</guid>
		<description>Is the &quot;future sofware&quot; released yet? There&#039;s an X in the transfer&#039;s view in Transmit 4.. Is that what you finally went for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the &#8220;future sofware&#8221; released yet? There&#8217;s an X in the transfer&#8217;s view in Transmit 4.. Is that what you finally went for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>This is *so* for an iPad app. OH YES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is *so* for an iPad app. OH YES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kaneda</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kaneda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-834</guid>
		<description>I would definitely stay away from any sort of (x) or delete imagery. If you&#039;re going graphic (not sure &quot;clear&quot; is wrong, per se) I would say the broom metaphor is the clearest (pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely stay away from any sort of (x) or delete imagery. If you&#8217;re going graphic (not sure &#8220;clear&#8221; is wrong, per se) I would say the broom metaphor is the clearest (pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-809</guid>
		<description>I love the dustbuster.  

I&#039;m not sure if it says Clear or not.  But I do think you have to find some place to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the dustbuster.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it says Clear or not.  But I do think you have to find some place to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Choi</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Choi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-807</guid>
		<description>This is one of Jef Raskin&#039;s original guidelines that he wrote way back in the 1980s or 1990s. He identified that icons are very often used when text would be better. A ton of programs back in the &#039;90s had this problem—they tried to use icons for everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of Jef Raskin&#8217;s original guidelines that he wrote way back in the 1980s or 1990s. He identified that icons are very often used when text would be better. A ton of programs back in the &#8217;90s had this problem—they tried to use icons for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Down10</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Down10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-803</guid>
		<description>For an icon symbol, I think I would stick with convention, or at least Apple&#039;s conventions.

If you look at Keyboard Viewer (formerly known as &quot;Key Caps&quot;), the symbol Apple uses as the &quot;Clear&quot; key on extended keyboards is this:

&#x2327;

That&#039;s the Unicode character U+2327, &#039;X IN A RECTANGLE BOX&#039;, or Apple GID 952: A simple box with an &quot;X&quot; over it. Not quite as stylish as the &quot;white x in a dark circle&quot;, but at a quick glance, its meaning is relatively clear (no pun intended). 

There&#039;s also Unicode char U+2392, &#039;CLEAR SCREEN SYMBOL&#039;, but it&#039;s not really supported by many fonts and it&#039;s (quite frankly) pretty crappy looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an icon symbol, I think I would stick with convention, or at least Apple&#8217;s conventions.</p>
<p>If you look at Keyboard Viewer (formerly known as &#8220;Key Caps&#8221;), the symbol Apple uses as the &#8220;Clear&#8221; key on extended keyboards is this:</p>
<p>&#x2327;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the Unicode character U+2327, &#8216;X IN A RECTANGLE BOX&#8217;, or Apple GID 952: A simple box with an &#8220;X&#8221; over it. Not quite as stylish as the &#8220;white x in a dark circle&#8221;, but at a quick glance, its meaning is relatively clear (no pun intended). </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also Unicode char U+2392, &#8216;CLEAR SCREEN SYMBOL&#8217;, but it&#8217;s not really supported by many fonts and it&#8217;s (quite frankly) pretty crappy looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevadamson</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>kevadamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-798</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen a few apps use a &quot;scissors&quot; icon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few apps use a &#8220;scissors&#8221; icon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/02/clear/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.panic.com/blog/?p=748#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Surely if so many people can come up with so many alternatives without agreeing, there&#039;s no suitable icon?

Any Icon should be easily understood by its audience without explanation, and it seems pretty clear this ain&#039;t going to happen in this case...

A trick I&#039;ve used before is to get a bunch of people, ideally potential/actual users, and definitely not only geeks, to draw the icon they think means &#039;clear&#039;, or whatever - if a decent number come up with something similar, work it up, show it to a bunch more peeps and see what they think it means. It soon becomes clear if there&#039;s anything that&#039;ll be universally understood...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely if so many people can come up with so many alternatives without agreeing, there&#8217;s no suitable icon?</p>
<p>Any Icon should be easily understood by its audience without explanation, and it seems pretty clear this ain&#8217;t going to happen in this case&#8230;</p>
<p>A trick I&#8217;ve used before is to get a bunch of people, ideally potential/actual users, and definitely not only geeks, to draw the icon they think means &#8216;clear&#8217;, or whatever &#8211; if a decent number come up with something similar, work it up, show it to a bunch more peeps and see what they think it means. It soon becomes clear if there&#8217;s anything that&#8217;ll be universally understood&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
